Mark Monroe’s “Titan: The OceanGate Catastrophe” is just too well-sourced and researched to be confused for a kind of ghoulish docs that exhibits up on Hulu inside every week of some main American disaster (they vary in topic from the Astroworld tragedy to the Diddy trial and the Fyre Competition), however this watchably morbid piece of Netflix content material nonetheless manages to one way or the other really feel each too quickly and too late on the identical time.
In fact, “too quickly” is a relative time period in relation to such issues lately, because the media — social and community alike — started salivating over this story effectively earlier than it was even confirmed that OceanGate founder Stockton Rush and the 4 passengers aboard his Titan submersible 4 passengers had been killed when the capsule imploded because it dove in direction of the ruins of the Titanic on June 18, 2023. That won’t sound prefer it was all that way back, however the final 24 months have suffered extra information cycles than a number of of the 24 years earlier than them, and time has been flattened to the purpose the place Stockton Rush and the 113-year-old shipwreck that summoned him to his dying may as effectively belong to the identical chapter of historic historical past.
Be that as it could, the very fact stays that the OceanGate catastrophe is so current — and, extra importantly, so well-remembered — that Monroe’s documentary must go a hell of rather a lot deeper to justify dredging it up once more for one more look. Whereas there’s nothing egregiously cynical concerning the movie’s nature or design, its forensic tone belies the familiarity of its proof, and its topic has already been too well-excavated for the sincerity of Monroe’s efforts to shake off that signature true-crime stink (the pungent stench of a once-proud medium that’s been left to rot on streaming).
Sure, it helps that Monroe frames this story as a cautionary story concerning the risks of surrendering frequent sense to cults of persona (not that it may very well be framed in some other approach), and the Elon Musk of all of it positively lends the doc a topicality that helps to validate its timing. However the dramatic irony of the catastrophe proves too irresistible for “Titan” to tug away from it, and — cue the ominously sawing violins — what might need been a extra illuminating exploration of “visionary” tradition settles for rubbernecking at some wealthy asshole whose dying has at all times been much less exceptional for its nightmarish circumstances than for the nationwide wave of schadenfreude that it induced.
Odds are that anybody studying this already is aware of every little thing they ever will about Stockton Rush, which “Titan” sees as permission to not plumb any deeper below the floor. Nonetheless, the clips that Monroe makes use of to make his case towards the square-jawed CEO — who appears to have believed that his inherent greatness was essentially the most precious security measure any submersible may ever hope to have onboard — are extra damning than something I keep in mind seeing on TV across the time of the incident. “In the event you hear an alarm, don’t fear about it,” we hear Rush saying at the beginning of the movie. “Smartest thing to do is to not do something.” Later, Monroe features a clip from a panel present the place Rush claims that Titan’s carbon fiber hull is “just about invulnerable.” When the interviewer mentions that individuals mentioned the identical factor concerning the Titanic, Rush solely nods and smiles. Historical past is seldom sort to the lads who condescend to it.
“Titan” predictably decides to open with footage shot simply earlier than the catastrophe as a teaser for the deaths to come back, however reasonably than merely roll again in time and wend his approach ahead by means of the years from there (with quite a lot of speaking heads readily available to share their private experiences of working with Rush), Monroe opts for a extra pincer-like construction that cuts between the creation of OceanGate and the congressional hearings that adopted its collapse. That strategy fails to account for the movie’s disinterest in Rush’s private life and/or the foundation causes of his egotism, however it does assist to underscore the fated inevitability of the Titan’s implosion, which was apparent to everybody besides the individuals who died in it.
Rush’s passengers — who had been by no means categorized as such, as a result of that might have made OceanGate topic to extra of the federal government rules that its CEO so overtly defied — largely go unmentioned right here, which is a obtrusive omission for a movie so targeted on the nuts and bolts of how charisma can seduce folks out of their frequent sense. I think the choice was largely borne out of sensitivity for the harmless useless, even when the exception “Titan” makes for deep-sea explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet is freighted with the implication that he ought to have recognized higher (Nargeolet’s daughter Sidonie agreed to be interviewed for the movie, although her testimony does extra to impress our feelings than to clarify her father’s decisions).
Monroe focuses as an alternative on OceanGate’s former workers, like operations director David Lochridge, who blew the whistle on — and was instantly fired from — Rush’s firm as quickly as he understood the extent of the dangers concerned. And “Titan” outlines these dangers in queasy and exhaustive element, particularly in relation to the carbon fiber that Rush used for the Titan hull as an inexpensive substitute for the business customary steels and alloys (my abdomen dropped on the half the place the CEO brags about his new hires from Boeing). It’s one factor to examine what it gave the impression of when the fiber started to crack, however it’s one other to listen to that ear-splitting horror for your self as OceanGate’s engineers check out the fabric. In lieu of footage from the fateful dive itself, Monroe successfully makes use of archival video like that to feed our imaginations, and lend a bodily dimension to what it meant each time Rush bragged that OceanGate was “doing bizarre shit.”
The carbon fiber hull — designed with the thought of making a tourist-friendly, brand-forward fleet of submersibles in thoughts — additionally epitomizes the diploma to which OceanGate was a direct expression of its founder. Like Steve Jobs with Apple or Musk with Tesla, Rush made himself inextricable from his firm, to the purpose that any criticism of its product was naturally taken as a criticism of himself, and vice-versa.
To that finish, the argument may very well be made that “Titan” — in its detailed evaluation of how OceanGate morphed from a science-driven enterprise to a flashier enterprise that ate up public marvel — reveals extra about who Rush was than a extra conventional biodoc ever may. However Monroe’s movie is just too entranced by its personal drumbeat of macabre particulars to do rather more than gawk on the actuality of who Rush was below all of his capital and confidence, and to shake its head at the truth that most individuals couldn’t see that actuality till it was too late.
Whereas “Titan” is an undoubtedly authoritative display screen account of what led to the OceanGate catastrophe, the story it tells is so apparent in hindsight — and its telling so content material with the macabre leisure of exploring that obviousness — that Monroe’s documentary can solely get so deep into what the deaths of Stockton Rush and his victims portend for the world at giant. “It’s tradition that induced this to occur,” says one of many movie’s speaking heads. “It’s tradition that killed the folks.” If we perceive what they imply, that’s largely as a result of it’s threatening to kill the remainder of us too.
Grade: C
“Titan: The OceanGate Catastrophe” premiered on the 2025 Tribeca Competition. It is going to be out there to stream on Netflix beginning Wednesday, June 11.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and demanding ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched e-newsletter, In Evaluate by David Ehrlich, wherein our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the perfect new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.